QUESTION:
How can my band make money by arranging our own gig? When we tried to do it, by
renting a room and selling tickets, we ended up losing money, although there
was great attendance, especially by younger fans. The promoter we rented
the concert hall from didn't advertise the show and we had to pay a lot
of money for ads in addition to doing all the advertising work ourselves, while
he got the profits. It seems unfair.
ANSWER:
When you use the term "advertising" I think you really mean "promotion" -- all
the efforts that are made to make a show successful. Part of the problem is
that when someone rents a room from a promoter, the promoter then becomes more
of a Landlord, and the incentive to work on the show is diminished.
Since he gets the rent whether or not many tickets are sold, it seems like
a done deal to him, particularly if its an all-ages event where bar sales
are not likely to be huge even if the room is packed.
A good all-ages venue is needed in Denver, but its difficult to maintain one because
of high start up costs, horrid insurance rates, etc. And of course bands
want to keep their ticket prices low to attract fans. And when those fans
turn 21 in just a few years, they want to go to BARS, so you've constantly
got to develop a new crowd, whereas at over-21 nightclubs there are always
the "regulars".
If a band (or a lineup of a group of bands) can pull in big numbers of people for
a show, its time to go to a promoter or club owner and get booked (as opposed
to renting the room, which is generally a no-win situation). The promoter
would have interest at that level of attendance and then he or she would
assume the responsibilities of promoting the event in order to turn a profit.
The obvious benefit for the talent of course is that they get a guaranteed
fee for their services and don't have to hassle with the details of the
promoter's job. And if the event loses money it doesn't come out of the
acts' pocket.
The downside is that the promoter will want to raise the ticket price in order
to lower the risk, and while most loyal fans will pay the extra buck or two,
some attendance could be lost. And the bands want to INCREASE their following,
get NEW people in to see them, etc., so they want it to be as easy as
possible for people of all ages to come. If you had charged $6 at your show,
and $10 for day-of, you would have grossed around $5000, and shouldn't have
been required to absorb any expenses other than rent and promotion -- but
likely still wouldn't have broken even. The clubs do strip ads and get severe
discounts via an annual rate, while the occasional advertiser has to pay
exorbitant amounts. Its really tough to do a good job.
I'm a major proponent of mailing lists, but of course there is still a big investment
in time and money to send gig announcements out. Yet they seem to be
more effective than random ads, because they're directed to people you know
are already interested. And rooms pay attention if you tell them you have
a mailing list of 500 or 1000 and will market a gig in their room. They know
from experience that it works.
Most bar type clubs advertise on a weekly basis. Promoters such as NIPP and 2B
Announced do posters and flyers, but like I said when they're acting as Landlord
they figure they needn't bother, as the renter of the room, be it another
promoter or the bands themselves, are effectively assuming the role of
promoter at that point. But I agree that they should help out and at the very
least include it in their calendars (which I think they usually do).
Rents of up to $4000 a night for a concert hall seem high, but if the show
is on a weekend, they might be giving up a night where they could have
had significant liquor sales in deference to an act with an under-21
following, and in the final analysis they're only looking at the numbers
and their own bills. Thus, a band must make it appear attractive to the
owner of the room to seek THEM out and assume the risks themselves. As
well as the responsibilities of selling the show to the public.
It is important to be aware of all of the issues involved. Take a minute to consider
the scenario from a room's perspective: On a slow night with a local
show, say you've got a box office person, a bar manager, a bartender, a waitress,
a sound engineer (and hopefully also a monitor engineer), someone working
the door, a few security guys, etc. That's about $150 an hour right there
to keep the doors open. Say the owner's monthly rent (or mortgage
payment or whatever) is $10,000, which would break down to about $300 per night.
Add in insurance premiums, utilities, phone, daytime employees, equipment
costs (sound AND office), janitor services, trash pickup, etc., and it
soon becomes apparent that you MUST earn at least a couple of thousand dollars
a night to stay alive. And if you factor in the nights when they're closed,
the overview gets even more critical.
So they've got to have winners to make their nut. And if people aren't drinking
the loss increases with each hour that passes. Most companies are willing
to support a promising band and help it develop a following in order to
cash in as the group becomes more popular and continues to play the room, but
competition is fierce for the acts that can reliably draw, and it sometimes
costs less to be closed on a slow night than to indulge a band that
seems stagnant. That is especially true if the group attracts a destructive audience
or one apt to piss off the neighbors, which is another HUGE problem for
club owners. The band packs up and goes home, and the club is left a mess,
often with sound equipment damaged or missing, and the neighbors screaming
to the City Council loud enough to make renewal of the license the next
time its up a big problem -- then there's lawyers, accountants . . .
I'm not defending local venues' failure to support the scene. I'm hoping everyone
can work together to create a situation that's fair and mutually rewarding.
One of the purposes of the music association is to review and discuss
the problems and figure out ways to make it easier for everyone to work,
and hence for the scene to continue to grow.
Some bands have successfully presented their own shows, but it seems they often
use a warehouse or other economical space not normally considered a music
venue. After solving the sound problems, however, you face the difficulty
of getting the word out without attracting the uniformed types concerned
with zoning violations, noise levels (if its in a residential area),
licensing, the potential for underage drinking, drug use, and blah, blah,
blah (as Iggy Pop so eloquently described it). And if anyone is accidentally
hurt, the liability issues would be overwhelming.
One of the biggest failures in our scene, I think, is the fact that popular local
groups are rarely heard or advertised on the radio, so that new people can
become aware of the talent and become avid listeners, buyers of product and
audience members. Every band is local to SOME city and exposure is what boosts
them up to state, regional and national levels, assuming they've got
what it takes. In my opinion, this city is particularly bad in regard to radio
airplay, TV exposure and most of all, PRESS. If the media were more supportive,
the clubs and promoters would fall into line because they COULD; because
audiences would be hearing about the shows, coming, and lowering the financial
risk for the people paying the bands.
Thus, I feel the music community should address the press and the broadcasters
and convince them to support local music. And that is a predominant goal
of the Colorado Music Association. If we can coalesce all the scattered
energy into one strong and impressive body, we can use pressure and effect
real change. There truly is strength in numbers.
With kindest regards,
Dolly Zander